Gespeichert in:
| Titel: | Property Rights and Bijuralism Can a Framework for an Efficient Interaction of Common Law and Civil Law Be an Alternative to Uniform Law? |
|---|---|
| Person: |
Bornheim, Jan Jakob
aut |
| Hauptverfasser: | |
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Tübingen
Mohr Siebeck
2020
|
| Ausgabe: | 1. Aufl. |
| Schriftenreihe: | Studien zum ausländischen und internationalen Privatrecht
|
| Schlagwörter: |
Comparative Law
> Kommunalverfassung
> marginof appreciation
> Legal Theory
> indirekte Steuerung
> pietistischer Separatismus
> Property Law
> Conflict of Laws
> Rechtstheorie
> Bürgerliches Recht
> Handels- und Gesellschaftsrecht, Wirtschaftsrecht, Steuerrecht
> Internationales Privatrecht
> Ausländisches Recht, Rechtsvergleichung
|
| Medienzugang: | https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-159169-3 |
| Zusammenfassung: | Using the Canadian experience as a model, Jan Jakob Bornheim shows that the efficient interaction of common law and civil law can take place on both vertical and horizontal planes. Das kanadische Zivilrecht bewahrt das englische und das kontinentaleuropäische Erbe. Jan Jakob Bornheim weist nach, dass eine effiziente Koexistenz der beiden Rechtssysteme möglich ist und zeigt Alternativen zur Rechtsvereinheitlichung im Einheitsstaat auf. Jan Jakob Bornheim analyses the hypothesis about the inherent efficiency of common law compared to civil law. He examines key commercial property law concepts (i.e., ownership and security interests in relation to movables) and determines the characteristics of each system with regard to these. Using the Canadian experience as a model, he then takes a close look at how the two legal systems interact, arguing that efficient interaction can take place on both vertical and horizontal planes. On the vertical plane, property law would be able to interact with higher-level law (e.g., federal law in a federal state); on the horizontal plane, property laws of different jurisdictions could interact through the conflict of laws. The author also contends that equitable property rights, including constructive trusts as a response to unjust enrichment, should be governed by property law choice-of-law rules. |
| Beschreibung: | PublicationDate: 20201022 |
| Umfang: | 1 Online-Ressource (XXXVII, 554 Seiten) |
| ISBN: | 9783161591693 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a22000005i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-197-MSE-32368 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | s2020 gw o eng d | ||
| 040 | |a Preselect.media GmbH | ||
| 020 | |a 9783161591693 | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |z 9783161591686 |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |
| 588 | |a Druckversion | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1628/978-3-16-159169-3 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 32368 | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 966 | 4 | 0 | |l DE-355 |p ZDB-197-MSE |q UBG_PDA_MSE |u https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-159169-3 |u https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/9783161591693 |q pdf |3 Volltext |
| 093 | |b a | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Bornheim, Jan Jakob |0 (orcid)0000-0003-0598-4646 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Property Rights and Bijuralism |h [Elektronische Ressource] : |b Can a Framework for an Efficient Interaction of Common Law and Civil Law Be an Alternative to Uniform Law? |
| 250 | |a 1. Aufl. | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Tübingen |b Mohr Siebeck |c 2020 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (XXXVII, 554 Seiten) | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Studien zum ausländischen und internationalen Privatrecht | |
| 500 | |a PublicationDate: 20201022 | ||
| 520 | |a Using the Canadian experience as a model, Jan Jakob Bornheim shows that the efficient interaction of common law and civil law can take place on both vertical and horizontal planes. | ||
| 520 | |a Das kanadische Zivilrecht bewahrt das englische und das kontinentaleuropäische Erbe. Jan Jakob Bornheim weist nach, dass eine effiziente Koexistenz der beiden Rechtssysteme möglich ist und zeigt Alternativen zur Rechtsvereinheitlichung im Einheitsstaat auf. | ||
| 520 | |a Jan Jakob Bornheim analyses the hypothesis about the inherent efficiency of common law compared to civil law. He examines key commercial property law concepts (i.e., ownership and security interests in relation to movables) and determines the characteristics of each system with regard to these. Using the Canadian experience as a model, he then takes a close look at how the two legal systems interact, arguing that efficient interaction can take place on both vertical and horizontal planes. On the vertical plane, property law would be able to interact with higher-level law (e.g., federal law in a federal state); on the horizontal plane, property laws of different jurisdictions could interact through the conflict of laws. The author also contends that equitable property rights, including constructive trusts as a response to unjust enrichment, should be governed by property law choice-of-law rules. | ||
| 653 | 0 | 0 | |a Comparative Law |a Kommunalverfassung |a marginof appreciation |a Legal Theory |a indirekte Steuerung |a pietistischer Separatismus |a Property Law |a Conflict of Laws |a Rechtstheorie |a Bürgerliches Recht |a Handels- und Gesellschaftsrecht, Wirtschaftsrecht, Steuerrecht |a Internationales Privatrecht |a Ausländisches Recht, Rechtsvergleichung |
| 912 | |a ZDB-197-MSE | ||
| 912 | |a Rechtswissenschaft 2020 |a ZDB-197-MRW |b 2020 | ||
| 912 | |a EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2021 |a EBS-197-MRW |b 2021 | ||
| 912 | |a EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2022 |a EBS-197-MRW |b 2022 | ||
| 912 | |a EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2023 |a EBS-197-MRW |b 2023 | ||
| 912 | |a EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2024 |a EBS-197-MRW |b 2024 | ||
| 912 | |a EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2025 |a EBS-197-MRW |b 2025 | ||
| 950 | |a Rechtswissenschaft 2020 | ||
| 950 | |a EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2021 | ||
| 950 | |a EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2022 | ||
| 950 | |a EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2023 | ||
| 950 | |a EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2024 | ||
| 950 | |a EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2025 | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-197-MSE | ||
| 049 | |a DE-355 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-UBR_katkey | ZDB-197-MSE-32368 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1835726845314596864 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Bornheim, Jan Jakob |
| author_GND | (orcid)0000-0003-0598-4646 |
| author_facet | Bornheim, Jan Jakob |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Bornheim, Jan Jakob |
| author_variant | j j b jj jjb |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localUBR |
| collection | ZDB-197-MSE Rechtswissenschaft 2020 ZDB-197-MRW EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2021 EBS-197-MRW EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2022 EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2023 EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2024 EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2025 |
| ctrlnum | 32368 |
| edition | 1. Aufl. |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03556nam a22005055i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-197-MSE-32368</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008"> s2020 gw o eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Preselect.media GmbH</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783161591693</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="z">9783161591686</subfield><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Druckversion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1628/978-3-16-159169-3</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">32368</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-197-MSE</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_MSE</subfield><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-159169-3</subfield><subfield code="u">https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/9783161591693</subfield><subfield code="q">pdf</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="093" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">a</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bornheim, Jan Jakob</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-0598-4646</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Property Rights and Bijuralism</subfield><subfield code="h">[Elektronische Ressource] :</subfield><subfield code="b">Can a Framework for an Efficient Interaction of Common Law and Civil Law Be an Alternative to Uniform Law?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. Aufl.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Tübingen</subfield><subfield code="b">Mohr Siebeck</subfield><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (XXXVII, 554 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Studien zum ausländischen und internationalen Privatrecht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PublicationDate: 20201022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Using the Canadian experience as a model, Jan Jakob Bornheim shows that the efficient interaction of common law and civil law can take place on both vertical and horizontal planes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Das kanadische Zivilrecht bewahrt das englische und das kontinentaleuropäische Erbe. Jan Jakob Bornheim weist nach, dass eine effiziente Koexistenz der beiden Rechtssysteme möglich ist und zeigt Alternativen zur Rechtsvereinheitlichung im Einheitsstaat auf.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jan Jakob Bornheim analyses the hypothesis about the inherent efficiency of common law compared to civil law. He examines key commercial property law concepts (i.e., ownership and security interests in relation to movables) and determines the characteristics of each system with regard to these. Using the Canadian experience as a model, he then takes a close look at how the two legal systems interact, arguing that efficient interaction can take place on both vertical and horizontal planes. On the vertical plane, property law would be able to interact with higher-level law (e.g., federal law in a federal state); on the horizontal plane, property laws of different jurisdictions could interact through the conflict of laws. The author also contends that equitable property rights, including constructive trusts as a response to unjust enrichment, should be governed by property law choice-of-law rules.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparative Law</subfield><subfield code="a">Kommunalverfassung</subfield><subfield code="a">marginof appreciation</subfield><subfield code="a">Legal Theory</subfield><subfield code="a">indirekte Steuerung</subfield><subfield code="a">pietistischer Separatismus</subfield><subfield code="a">Property Law</subfield><subfield code="a">Conflict of Laws</subfield><subfield code="a">Rechtstheorie</subfield><subfield code="a">Bürgerliches Recht</subfield><subfield code="a">Handels- und Gesellschaftsrecht, Wirtschaftsrecht, Steuerrecht</subfield><subfield code="a">Internationales Privatrecht</subfield><subfield code="a">Ausländisches Recht, Rechtsvergleichung</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-197-MSE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rechtswissenschaft 2020</subfield><subfield code="a">ZDB-197-MRW</subfield><subfield code="b">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2021</subfield><subfield code="a">EBS-197-MRW</subfield><subfield code="b">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2022</subfield><subfield code="a">EBS-197-MRW</subfield><subfield code="b">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2023</subfield><subfield code="a">EBS-197-MRW</subfield><subfield code="b">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2024</subfield><subfield code="a">EBS-197-MRW</subfield><subfield code="b">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2025</subfield><subfield code="a">EBS-197-MRW</subfield><subfield code="b">2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rechtswissenschaft 2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-197-MSE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | ZDB-197-MSE-32368 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2025-06-23T13:32:24Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9783161591693 |
| language | English |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-355 DE-BY-UBR |
| owner_facet | DE-355 DE-BY-UBR |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (XXXVII, 554 Seiten) |
| psigel | ZDB-197-MSE UBG_PDA_MSE pdf ZDB-197-MSE Rechtswissenschaft 2020 ZDB-197-MRW EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2021 EBS-197-MRW EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2022 EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2023 EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2024 EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2025 |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSearch | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | Mohr Siebeck |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Studien zum ausländischen und internationalen Privatrecht |
| spelling | text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier 9783161591686 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Druckversion Bornheim, Jan Jakob (orcid)0000-0003-0598-4646 aut Property Rights and Bijuralism [Elektronische Ressource] : Can a Framework for an Efficient Interaction of Common Law and Civil Law Be an Alternative to Uniform Law? 1. Aufl. Tübingen Mohr Siebeck 2020 1 Online-Ressource (XXXVII, 554 Seiten) Studien zum ausländischen und internationalen Privatrecht PublicationDate: 20201022 Using the Canadian experience as a model, Jan Jakob Bornheim shows that the efficient interaction of common law and civil law can take place on both vertical and horizontal planes. Das kanadische Zivilrecht bewahrt das englische und das kontinentaleuropäische Erbe. Jan Jakob Bornheim weist nach, dass eine effiziente Koexistenz der beiden Rechtssysteme möglich ist und zeigt Alternativen zur Rechtsvereinheitlichung im Einheitsstaat auf. Jan Jakob Bornheim analyses the hypothesis about the inherent efficiency of common law compared to civil law. He examines key commercial property law concepts (i.e., ownership and security interests in relation to movables) and determines the characteristics of each system with regard to these. Using the Canadian experience as a model, he then takes a close look at how the two legal systems interact, arguing that efficient interaction can take place on both vertical and horizontal planes. On the vertical plane, property law would be able to interact with higher-level law (e.g., federal law in a federal state); on the horizontal plane, property laws of different jurisdictions could interact through the conflict of laws. The author also contends that equitable property rights, including constructive trusts as a response to unjust enrichment, should be governed by property law choice-of-law rules. Comparative Law Kommunalverfassung marginof appreciation Legal Theory indirekte Steuerung pietistischer Separatismus Property Law Conflict of Laws Rechtstheorie Bürgerliches Recht Handels- und Gesellschaftsrecht, Wirtschaftsrecht, Steuerrecht Internationales Privatrecht Ausländisches Recht, Rechtsvergleichung |
| spellingShingle | Bornheim, Jan Jakob Property Rights and Bijuralism Can a Framework for an Efficient Interaction of Common Law and Civil Law Be an Alternative to Uniform Law? |
| title | Property Rights and Bijuralism Can a Framework for an Efficient Interaction of Common Law and Civil Law Be an Alternative to Uniform Law? |
| title_auth | Property Rights and Bijuralism Can a Framework for an Efficient Interaction of Common Law and Civil Law Be an Alternative to Uniform Law? |
| title_exact_search | Property Rights and Bijuralism Can a Framework for an Efficient Interaction of Common Law and Civil Law Be an Alternative to Uniform Law? |
| title_full | Property Rights and Bijuralism [Elektronische Ressource] : Can a Framework for an Efficient Interaction of Common Law and Civil Law Be an Alternative to Uniform Law? |
| title_fullStr | Property Rights and Bijuralism [Elektronische Ressource] : Can a Framework for an Efficient Interaction of Common Law and Civil Law Be an Alternative to Uniform Law? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Property Rights and Bijuralism [Elektronische Ressource] : Can a Framework for an Efficient Interaction of Common Law and Civil Law Be an Alternative to Uniform Law? |
| title_short | Property Rights and Bijuralism |
| title_sort | property rights and bijuralism can a framework for an efficient interaction of common law and civil law be an alternative to uniform law |
| title_sub | Can a Framework for an Efficient Interaction of Common Law and Civil Law Be an Alternative to Uniform Law? |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bornheimjanjakob propertyrightsandbijuralismcanaframeworkforanefficientinteractionofcommonlawandcivillawbeanalternativetouniformlaw |