Saved in:
| Title: | Public Epistemic Authority Normative Institutional Design for EU Law |
|---|---|
| Person: |
Laux, Johann Moritz
aut |
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Tübingen
Mohr Siebeck
2022
|
| Edition: | 1. Aufl. |
| Series: | Grundlagen der Rechtswissenschaft
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-160257-3 |
| Summary: | Every court claims authority. Normative scholars assess the legitimacy of those claims. Public Epistemic Authority provides a new perspective on this task by drawing on mechanisms of collective intelligence and comparing courts reliability as decision-makers to that of other branches of government. Jedes Gericht beansprucht Autorität. Normwissenschaftler beurteilen die Legitimität dieser Ansprüche. Johann Moritz Laux betrachtet diese Aufgabe von einem neuen Blickwinkel, indem er auf Mechanismen der kollektiven Intelligenz zurückgreift und die Verlässlichkeit der Gerichte als Entscheidungsträger mit der anderer Regierungszweige vergleicht. Inter- and supranational courts derive their legitimacy partly from an institutional comparison: judges legal expertise and the quality of judicial procedures justify a courts claim to authority towards other branches of government and other courts with overlapping jurisdiction. To provide a benchmark for assessing judicial outcomes that is compatible with democratic commitments, Johann Laux suggests a new normative category, Public Epistemic Authority (PEA). It builds on the mechanisms behind theories of collective intelligence and empirical research on judicial decision-making. PEA tracks judges collective ability to reliably identify breaches of law. It focuses on cognitive tasks in adjudication. The author applies PEA to the Court of Justice of the European Union and offers suggestions for improving its institutional design. |
| Item Description: | PublicationDate: 20220630 |
| Physical Description: | 1 Online-Ressource (XVII, 466 Seiten) |
| ISBN: | 9783161602573 |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a22000005i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-197-MSE-38599 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | s2022 gw o eng d | ||
| 040 | |a Preselect.media GmbH | ||
| 020 | |a 9783161602573 | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |z 9783161600692 |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |
| 588 | |a Druckversion | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1628/978-3-16-160257-3 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 38599 | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 966 | 4 | 0 | |l DE-355 |p ZDB-197-MSE |q UBG_PDA_MSE |u https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-160257-3 |u https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/9783161602573 |q pdf |3 Volltext |
| 093 | |b a | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Laux, Johann Moritz |0 (orcid)0000-0003-3043-075X |4 aut | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Public Epistemic Authority |h [Elektronische Ressource] : |b Normative Institutional Design for EU Law |
| 250 | |a 1. Aufl. | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Tübingen |b Mohr Siebeck |c 2022 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (XVII, 466 Seiten) | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Grundlagen der Rechtswissenschaft | |
| 500 | |a PublicationDate: 20220630 | ||
| 520 | |a Every court claims authority. Normative scholars assess the legitimacy of those claims. Public Epistemic Authority provides a new perspective on this task by drawing on mechanisms of collective intelligence and comparing courts reliability as decision-makers to that of other branches of government. | ||
| 520 | |a Jedes Gericht beansprucht Autorität. Normwissenschaftler beurteilen die Legitimität dieser Ansprüche. Johann Moritz Laux betrachtet diese Aufgabe von einem neuen Blickwinkel, indem er auf Mechanismen der kollektiven Intelligenz zurückgreift und die Verlässlichkeit der Gerichte als Entscheidungsträger mit der anderer Regierungszweige vergleicht. | ||
| 520 | |a Inter- and supranational courts derive their legitimacy partly from an institutional comparison: judges legal expertise and the quality of judicial procedures justify a courts claim to authority towards other branches of government and other courts with overlapping jurisdiction. To provide a benchmark for assessing judicial outcomes that is compatible with democratic commitments, Johann Laux suggests a new normative category, Public Epistemic Authority (PEA). It builds on the mechanisms behind theories of collective intelligence and empirical research on judicial decision-making. PEA tracks judges collective ability to reliably identify breaches of law. It focuses on cognitive tasks in adjudication. The author applies PEA to the Court of Justice of the European Union and offers suggestions for improving its institutional design. | ||
| 653 | 0 | 0 | |a Rom-Verordnungen |a Legitimacy |a PACS |a prediction |a machine learning |a democracy |a Collective Intelligence; |a Wisdom of the Crowds |a Cognitive Diversity |a Lehre von der objektiven Zurechnung |a Rechtsphilosophie |a Rechtstheorie |a Verfassungsrecht und Staatslehre |a Verwaltungsrecht |a Europarecht |
| 912 | |a ZDB-197-MSE | ||
| 912 | |a Rechtswissenschaft 2021 |a ZDB-197-MRW |b 2021 | ||
| 912 | |a EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2022 |a EBS-197-MRW |b 2022 | ||
| 912 | |a Rechtswissenschaft 2022 |a ZDB-197-MRW |b 2022 | ||
| 912 | |a EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2023 |a EBS-197-MRW |b 2023 | ||
| 912 | |a EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2024 |a EBS-197-MRW |b 2024 | ||
| 912 | |a EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2025 |a EBS-197-MRW |b 2025 | ||
| 950 | |a Rechtswissenschaft 2021 | ||
| 950 | |a EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2022 | ||
| 950 | |a Rechtswissenschaft 2022 | ||
| 950 | |a EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2023 | ||
| 950 | |a EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2024 | ||
| 950 | |a EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2025 | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-197-MSE | ||
| 049 | |a DE-355 | ||
Record in the Search Index
| DE-BY-UBR_katkey | ZDB-197-MSE-38599 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1835726849178599424 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Laux, Johann Moritz |
| author_GND | (orcid)0000-0003-3043-075X |
| author_facet | Laux, Johann Moritz |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Laux, Johann Moritz |
| author_variant | j m l jm jml |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localUBR |
| collection | ZDB-197-MSE Rechtswissenschaft 2021 ZDB-197-MRW EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2022 EBS-197-MRW Rechtswissenschaft 2022 EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2023 EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2024 EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2025 |
| ctrlnum | 38599 |
| edition | 1. Aufl. |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03554nam a22005055i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-197-MSE-38599</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008"> s2022 gw o eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Preselect.media GmbH</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783161602573</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="z">9783161600692</subfield><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Druckversion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1628/978-3-16-160257-3</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">38599</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-197-MSE</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_MSE</subfield><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-160257-3</subfield><subfield code="u">https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/9783161602573</subfield><subfield code="q">pdf</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="093" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">a</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Laux, Johann Moritz</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-3043-075X</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Public Epistemic Authority</subfield><subfield code="h">[Elektronische Ressource] :</subfield><subfield code="b">Normative Institutional Design for EU Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. Aufl.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Tübingen</subfield><subfield code="b">Mohr Siebeck</subfield><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (XVII, 466 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Grundlagen der Rechtswissenschaft</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PublicationDate: 20220630</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Every court claims authority. Normative scholars assess the legitimacy of those claims. Public Epistemic Authority provides a new perspective on this task by drawing on mechanisms of collective intelligence and comparing courts reliability as decision-makers to that of other branches of government.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jedes Gericht beansprucht Autorität. Normwissenschaftler beurteilen die Legitimität dieser Ansprüche. Johann Moritz Laux betrachtet diese Aufgabe von einem neuen Blickwinkel, indem er auf Mechanismen der kollektiven Intelligenz zurückgreift und die Verlässlichkeit der Gerichte als Entscheidungsträger mit der anderer Regierungszweige vergleicht.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Inter- and supranational courts derive their legitimacy partly from an institutional comparison: judges legal expertise and the quality of judicial procedures justify a courts claim to authority towards other branches of government and other courts with overlapping jurisdiction. To provide a benchmark for assessing judicial outcomes that is compatible with democratic commitments, Johann Laux suggests a new normative category, Public Epistemic Authority (PEA). It builds on the mechanisms behind theories of collective intelligence and empirical research on judicial decision-making. PEA tracks judges collective ability to reliably identify breaches of law. It focuses on cognitive tasks in adjudication. The author applies PEA to the Court of Justice of the European Union and offers suggestions for improving its institutional design.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rom-Verordnungen</subfield><subfield code="a">Legitimacy</subfield><subfield code="a">PACS</subfield><subfield code="a">prediction</subfield><subfield code="a">machine learning</subfield><subfield code="a">democracy</subfield><subfield code="a">Collective Intelligence;</subfield><subfield code="a">Wisdom of the Crowds</subfield><subfield code="a">Cognitive Diversity</subfield><subfield code="a">Lehre von der objektiven Zurechnung</subfield><subfield code="a">Rechtsphilosophie</subfield><subfield code="a">Rechtstheorie</subfield><subfield code="a">Verfassungsrecht und Staatslehre</subfield><subfield code="a">Verwaltungsrecht</subfield><subfield code="a">Europarecht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-197-MSE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rechtswissenschaft 2021</subfield><subfield code="a">ZDB-197-MRW</subfield><subfield code="b">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2022</subfield><subfield code="a">EBS-197-MRW</subfield><subfield code="b">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rechtswissenschaft 2022</subfield><subfield code="a">ZDB-197-MRW</subfield><subfield code="b">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2023</subfield><subfield code="a">EBS-197-MRW</subfield><subfield code="b">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2024</subfield><subfield code="a">EBS-197-MRW</subfield><subfield code="b">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2025</subfield><subfield code="a">EBS-197-MRW</subfield><subfield code="b">2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rechtswissenschaft 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rechtswissenschaft 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-197-MSE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | ZDB-197-MSE-38599 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2025-06-23T13:32:27Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9783161602573 |
| language | English |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-355 DE-BY-UBR |
| owner_facet | DE-355 DE-BY-UBR |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (XVII, 466 Seiten) |
| psigel | ZDB-197-MSE UBG_PDA_MSE pdf ZDB-197-MSE Rechtswissenschaft 2021 ZDB-197-MRW EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2022 EBS-197-MRW Rechtswissenschaft 2022 EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2023 EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2024 EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2025 |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publishDateSearch | 2022 |
| publishDateSort | 2022 |
| publisher | Mohr Siebeck |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Grundlagen der Rechtswissenschaft |
| spelling | text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier 9783161600692 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Druckversion Laux, Johann Moritz (orcid)0000-0003-3043-075X aut Public Epistemic Authority [Elektronische Ressource] : Normative Institutional Design for EU Law 1. Aufl. Tübingen Mohr Siebeck 2022 1 Online-Ressource (XVII, 466 Seiten) Grundlagen der Rechtswissenschaft PublicationDate: 20220630 Every court claims authority. Normative scholars assess the legitimacy of those claims. Public Epistemic Authority provides a new perspective on this task by drawing on mechanisms of collective intelligence and comparing courts reliability as decision-makers to that of other branches of government. Jedes Gericht beansprucht Autorität. Normwissenschaftler beurteilen die Legitimität dieser Ansprüche. Johann Moritz Laux betrachtet diese Aufgabe von einem neuen Blickwinkel, indem er auf Mechanismen der kollektiven Intelligenz zurückgreift und die Verlässlichkeit der Gerichte als Entscheidungsträger mit der anderer Regierungszweige vergleicht. Inter- and supranational courts derive their legitimacy partly from an institutional comparison: judges legal expertise and the quality of judicial procedures justify a courts claim to authority towards other branches of government and other courts with overlapping jurisdiction. To provide a benchmark for assessing judicial outcomes that is compatible with democratic commitments, Johann Laux suggests a new normative category, Public Epistemic Authority (PEA). It builds on the mechanisms behind theories of collective intelligence and empirical research on judicial decision-making. PEA tracks judges collective ability to reliably identify breaches of law. It focuses on cognitive tasks in adjudication. The author applies PEA to the Court of Justice of the European Union and offers suggestions for improving its institutional design. Rom-Verordnungen Legitimacy PACS prediction machine learning democracy Collective Intelligence; Wisdom of the Crowds Cognitive Diversity Lehre von der objektiven Zurechnung Rechtsphilosophie Rechtstheorie Verfassungsrecht und Staatslehre Verwaltungsrecht Europarecht |
| spellingShingle | Laux, Johann Moritz Public Epistemic Authority Normative Institutional Design for EU Law |
| title | Public Epistemic Authority Normative Institutional Design for EU Law |
| title_auth | Public Epistemic Authority Normative Institutional Design for EU Law |
| title_exact_search | Public Epistemic Authority Normative Institutional Design for EU Law |
| title_full | Public Epistemic Authority [Elektronische Ressource] : Normative Institutional Design for EU Law |
| title_fullStr | Public Epistemic Authority [Elektronische Ressource] : Normative Institutional Design for EU Law |
| title_full_unstemmed | Public Epistemic Authority [Elektronische Ressource] : Normative Institutional Design for EU Law |
| title_short | Public Epistemic Authority |
| title_sort | public epistemic authority normative institutional design for eu law |
| title_sub | Normative Institutional Design for EU Law |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lauxjohannmoritz publicepistemicauthoritynormativeinstitutionaldesignforeulaw |