Gespeichert in:
| Titel: | Freedom of Expression in the Platform Society The Right to Freedom of Expression as a Constraint on Public Authorities Power to Govern Online Speech Through Platform Companies |
|---|---|
| Person: |
Pirang, Alexander
aut |
| Hauptverfasser: | |
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Tübingen
Mohr Siebeck
2024
|
| Ausgabe: | 1. Aufl. |
| Schriftenreihe: | Internet und Gesellschaft
38 |
| Schlagwörter: |
Meinungsfreiheit
> Inhalte-Moderation
> Digital Services Act
> Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU
> European Convention on Human Rights
> Arabic Literature
> Ko-Regulierung
> vergleichendes Gesellschaftsrecht
> Ideenfreiheit
> bilateral delegation
> productivity-wage gap
> Online-Plattformen
> Environmental crisis
> Future
> Christian theology
> Instrumental cause
> Scholastic philosophy
> Normenklarheit
> Rechtsquellenklarheit
> Plattformregulierung
> Förmlichkeit des Verfahrens
> zwingender Charakter des Prozessrechts
> Kriegslegitimation
> Verfassungsrecht und Staatslehre
> Verwaltungsrecht
> Völkerrecht
> Europarecht
> Array
|
| Medienzugang: | https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-163963-0 |
| Zusammenfassung: | Meinungsfreiheit in der Plattformgesellschaft. Das Recht auf freie Meinungsäußerung als Grenze der durch Plattformunternehmen vermittelten staatlichen Regulierung von Meinungsäußerungen im Internet. Kann sich der Gesetzgeber seiner grundrechtlichen Verantwortung entziehen, indem er Online-Plattformen verpflichtet, nutzergenerierte Inhalte zu löschen? Alexander Pirang zeigt, dass das Recht auf Meinungsfreiheit nicht durch Plattformregulierung ausgehebelt wird. Can legislators launder state action through private companies by requiring online platforms to moderate content? Alexander Pirang asserts that platform users right to freedom of expression imposes effective constraints on public authorities power to regulate platform companies. The Digital Services Act aims to tackle illegal online speech by delegating content moderation tasks to platform providers. However, this approach is blurring the boundaries between public and private restrictions of platform users freedom of expression, which raises the question whether platform regulation allows legislators to launder state action through private companies. Alexander Pirang examines how the right to freedom of expression enshrined in the European Unions Charter of Fundamental Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights can function as a constraint on public authority power to regulate online platforms. Specifically, he analyzes how public authorities can be held responsible for speech restrictions enforced by platform providers. He also explores how such restrictions can be justified, with a focus on the necessary safeguards against the over-blocking of lawful content.Survey of contentsIntroductionI. Setting the stage - II. Hypothesis and research questions - III. Research scope - IV. Research design - V. Conceptual clarification: governance and regulation Chapter 1. First-order online speech governance: content moderationI. What is content moderation? - II. What role does context play in content moderation? - III. To what extent does content moderation impact freedom of expression? - IV. How do different incentives and constraints influence platform companies decision-making regarding content moderation? - V. Conclusion Chapter 2. Second-order online speech governance: platform regulationI. How has platform regulation evolved in the EU? - II. What are the rationales behind platform regulation? - III. How does platform regulation interact with other influences on platform companies decision-making? - IV. How does platform regulation operate in practice? - V. Conclusion Chapter 3. Third-order online speech governance: freedom of expressionI. To what extent does platform regulation allow public authorities to launder state action through platform companies private ordering? - II. To what extent does the case law of the ECtHR and the CJEU on causation and attribution provide avenues for overcoming the risks of laundered state action in the context of platform regulation? - III. How can limitations of users right to freedom of expression be established where public authorities require platform companies to moderate content? - IV. To what extent are public authorities obligated to minimize the risks of over-blocking in the context of platform regulation in order to justify limitations of users right to freedom of expression? - V. Conclusion Conclusion Kann sich der Gesetzgeber seiner grundrechtlichen Verantwortung entziehen, indem er Online-Plattformen verpflichtet, nutzergenerierte Inhalte zu löschen? Alexander Pirang zeigt, dass das Recht auf Meinungsfreiheit nicht durch Plattformregulierung ausgehebelt wird.Inhalts+uuml;bersichtIntroductionI. Setting the stage - II. Hypothesis and research questions - III. Research scope - IV. Research design - V. Conceptual clarification: governance and regulation Chapter 1. First-order online speech governance: content moderationI. What is content moderation? - II. What role does context play in content moderation? - III. To what extent does content moderation impact freedom of expression? - IV. How do different incentives and constraints influence platform companies decision-making regarding content moderation? - V. Conclusion Chapter 2. Second-order online speech governance: platform regulationI. How has platform regulation evolved in the EU? - II. What are the rationales behind platform regulation? - III. How does platform regulation interact with other influences on platform companies decision-making? - IV. How does platform regulation operate in practice? - V. Conclusion Chapter 3. Third-order online speech governance: freedom of expressionI. To what extent does platform regulation allow public authorities to launder state action through platform companies private ordering? - II. To what extent does the case law of the ECtHR and the CJEU on causation and attribution provide avenues for overcoming the risks of laundered state action in the context of platform regulation? - III. How can limitations of users right to freedom of expression be established where public authorities require platform companies to moderate content? - IV. To what extent are public authorities obligated to minimize the risks of over-blocking in the context of platform regulation in order to justify limitations of users right to freedom of expression? - V. Conclusion Conclusion |
| Beschreibung: | PublicationDate: 20241217 |
| Umfang: | 1 Online-Ressource (XIX, 430 Seiten) |
| ISBN: | 9783161639630 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a22000005i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ZDB-197-MSE-50643 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | s2024 gw o eng d | ||
| 040 | |a Preselect.media GmbH | ||
| 020 | |a 9783161639630 | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |z 9783161639623 |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |
| 588 | |a Druckversion | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1628/978-3-16-163963-0 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 50643 | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 966 | 4 | 0 | |l DE-355 |p ZDB-197-MSE |q UBG_PDA_MSE |u https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-163963-0 |u https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/9783161639630 |q pdf |3 Volltext |
| 093 | |b b | ||
| 540 | |a Creative Commons |2 cc |f cc-by-nc-nd-4.0 |u https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Pirang, Alexander |4 aut | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Freedom of Expression in the Platform Society |h [Elektronische Ressource] : |b The Right to Freedom of Expression as a Constraint on Public Authorities Power to Govern Online Speech Through Platform Companies |
| 250 | |a 1. Aufl. | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Tübingen |b Mohr Siebeck |c 2024 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (XIX, 430 Seiten) | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Internet und Gesellschaft |v 38 | |
| 500 | |a PublicationDate: 20241217 | ||
| 520 | |a Meinungsfreiheit in der Plattformgesellschaft. Das Recht auf freie Meinungsäußerung als Grenze der durch Plattformunternehmen vermittelten staatlichen Regulierung von Meinungsäußerungen im Internet. | ||
| 520 | |a Kann sich der Gesetzgeber seiner grundrechtlichen Verantwortung entziehen, indem er Online-Plattformen verpflichtet, nutzergenerierte Inhalte zu löschen? Alexander Pirang zeigt, dass das Recht auf Meinungsfreiheit nicht durch Plattformregulierung ausgehebelt wird. | ||
| 520 | |a Can legislators launder state action through private companies by requiring online platforms to moderate content? Alexander Pirang asserts that platform users right to freedom of expression imposes effective constraints on public authorities power to regulate platform companies. | ||
| 520 | |a The Digital Services Act aims to tackle illegal online speech by delegating content moderation tasks to platform providers. However, this approach is blurring the boundaries between public and private restrictions of platform users freedom of expression, which raises the question whether platform regulation allows legislators to launder state action through private companies. Alexander Pirang examines how the right to freedom of expression enshrined in the European Unions Charter of Fundamental Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights can function as a constraint on public authority power to regulate online platforms. Specifically, he analyzes how public authorities can be held responsible for speech restrictions enforced by platform providers. He also explores how such restrictions can be justified, with a focus on the necessary safeguards against the over-blocking of lawful content.Survey of contentsIntroductionI. Setting the stage - II. Hypothesis and research questions - III. Research scope - IV. Research design - V. Conceptual clarification: governance and regulation Chapter 1. First-order online speech governance: content moderationI. What is content moderation? - II. What role does context play in content moderation? - III. To what extent does content moderation impact freedom of expression? - IV. How do different incentives and constraints influence platform companies decision-making regarding content moderation? - V. Conclusion Chapter 2. Second-order online speech governance: platform regulationI. How has platform regulation evolved in the EU? - II. What are the rationales behind platform regulation? - III. How does platform regulation interact with other influences on platform companies decision-making? - IV. How does platform regulation operate in practice? - V. Conclusion Chapter 3. Third-order online speech governance: freedom of expressionI. To what extent does platform regulation allow public authorities to launder state action through platform companies private ordering? - II. To what extent does the case law of the ECtHR and the CJEU on causation and attribution provide avenues for overcoming the risks of laundered state action in the context of platform regulation? - III. How can limitations of users right to freedom of expression be established where public authorities require platform companies to moderate content? - IV. To what extent are public authorities obligated to minimize the risks of over-blocking in the context of platform regulation in order to justify limitations of users right to freedom of expression? - V. Conclusion Conclusion | ||
| 520 | |a Kann sich der Gesetzgeber seiner grundrechtlichen Verantwortung entziehen, indem er Online-Plattformen verpflichtet, nutzergenerierte Inhalte zu löschen? Alexander Pirang zeigt, dass das Recht auf Meinungsfreiheit nicht durch Plattformregulierung ausgehebelt wird.Inhalts+uuml;bersichtIntroductionI. Setting the stage - II. Hypothesis and research questions - III. Research scope - IV. Research design - V. Conceptual clarification: governance and regulation Chapter 1. First-order online speech governance: content moderationI. What is content moderation? - II. What role does context play in content moderation? - III. To what extent does content moderation impact freedom of expression? - IV. How do different incentives and constraints influence platform companies decision-making regarding content moderation? - V. Conclusion Chapter 2. Second-order online speech governance: platform regulationI. How has platform regulation evolved in the EU? - II. What are the rationales behind platform regulation? - III. How does platform regulation interact with other influences on platform companies decision-making? - IV. How does platform regulation operate in practice? - V. Conclusion Chapter 3. Third-order online speech governance: freedom of expressionI. To what extent does platform regulation allow public authorities to launder state action through platform companies private ordering? - II. To what extent does the case law of the ECtHR and the CJEU on causation and attribution provide avenues for overcoming the risks of laundered state action in the context of platform regulation? - III. How can limitations of users right to freedom of expression be established where public authorities require platform companies to moderate content? - IV. To what extent are public authorities obligated to minimize the risks of over-blocking in the context of platform regulation in order to justify limitations of users right to freedom of expression? - V. Conclusion Conclusion | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a I. Setting the stage - II. Hypothesis and research questions - III. Research scope - IV. Research design - V. Conceptual clarification: governance and regulation I. What is content moderation? - II. What role does context play in content moderation? - III. To what extent does content moderation impact freedom of expression? - IV. How do different incentives and constraints influence platform companies decision-making regarding content moderation? - V. Conclusion I. How has platform regulation evolved in the EU? - II. What are the rationales behind platform regulation? - III. How does platform regulation interact with other influences on platform companies decision-making? - IV. How does platform regulation operate in practice? - V. Conclusion I. To what extent does platform regulation allow public authorities to launder state action through platform companies private ordering? - II. To what extent does the case law of the ECtHR and the CJEU on causation and attribution provide avenues for overcoming the risks of laundered state action in the context of platform regulation? - III. How can limitations of users right to freedom of expression be established where public authorities require platform companies to moderate content? - IV. To what extent are public authorities obligated to minimize the risks of over-blocking in the context of platform regulation in order to justify limitations of users right to freedom of expression? - V. Conclusion | |
| 653 | 0 | 0 | |a Meinungsfreiheit |a Inhalte-Moderation |a Digital Services Act |a Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU |a European Convention on Human Rights |a Arabic Literature |a Ko-Regulierung |a vergleichendes Gesellschaftsrecht |a Ideenfreiheit |a bilateral delegation |a productivity-wage gap |a Online-Plattformen |a Environmental crisis |a Future |a Christian theology |a Instrumental cause |a Scholastic philosophy |a Normenklarheit |a Rechtsquellenklarheit |a Plattformregulierung |a Förmlichkeit des Verfahrens |a zwingender Charakter des Prozessrechts |a Kriegslegitimation |a Verfassungsrecht und Staatslehre |a Verwaltungsrecht |a Völkerrecht |a Europarecht |a Array |
| 912 | |a ZDB-197-MSE | ||
| 912 | |a EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2024 |a EBS-197-MRW |b 2024 | ||
| 912 | |a EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2025 |a EBS-197-MRW |b 2025 | ||
| 950 | |a EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2024 | ||
| 950 | |a EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2025 | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-197-MSE | ||
| 049 | |a DE-355 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-UBR_katkey | ZDB-197-MSE-50643 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1835726849822425089 |
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Pirang, Alexander |
| author_facet | Pirang, Alexander |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Pirang, Alexander |
| author_variant | a p ap |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | localUBR |
| collection | ZDB-197-MSE EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2024 EBS-197-MRW EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2025 |
| contents | I. Setting the stage - II. Hypothesis and research questions - III. Research scope - IV. Research design - V. Conceptual clarification: governance and regulation I. What is content moderation? - II. What role does context play in content moderation? - III. To what extent does content moderation impact freedom of expression? - IV. How do different incentives and constraints influence platform companies decision-making regarding content moderation? - V. Conclusion I. How has platform regulation evolved in the EU? - II. What are the rationales behind platform regulation? - III. How does platform regulation interact with other influences on platform companies decision-making? - IV. How does platform regulation operate in practice? - V. Conclusion I. To what extent does platform regulation allow public authorities to launder state action through platform companies private ordering? - II. To what extent does the case law of the ECtHR and the CJEU on causation and attribution provide avenues for overcoming the risks of laundered state action in the context of platform regulation? - III. How can limitations of users right to freedom of expression be established where public authorities require platform companies to moderate content? - IV. To what extent are public authorities obligated to minimize the risks of over-blocking in the context of platform regulation in order to justify limitations of users right to freedom of expression? - V. Conclusion |
| ctrlnum | 50643 |
| edition | 1. Aufl. |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>09023nam a22004575i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ZDB-197-MSE-50643</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008"> s2024 gw o eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Preselect.media GmbH</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783161639630</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="z">9783161639623</subfield><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Druckversion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1628/978-3-16-163963-0</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">50643</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="l">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-197-MSE</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_MSE</subfield><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-163963-0</subfield><subfield code="u">https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/9783161639630</subfield><subfield code="q">pdf</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="093" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Creative Commons</subfield><subfield code="2">cc</subfield><subfield code="f">cc-by-nc-nd-4.0</subfield><subfield code="u">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pirang, Alexander</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Freedom of Expression in the Platform Society</subfield><subfield code="h">[Elektronische Ressource] :</subfield><subfield code="b">The Right to Freedom of Expression as a Constraint on Public Authorities Power to Govern Online Speech Through Platform Companies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. Aufl.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Tübingen</subfield><subfield code="b">Mohr Siebeck</subfield><subfield code="c">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (XIX, 430 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Internet und Gesellschaft</subfield><subfield code="v">38</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PublicationDate: 20241217</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Meinungsfreiheit in der Plattformgesellschaft. Das Recht auf freie Meinungsäußerung als Grenze der durch Plattformunternehmen vermittelten staatlichen Regulierung von Meinungsäußerungen im Internet.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kann sich der Gesetzgeber seiner grundrechtlichen Verantwortung entziehen, indem er Online-Plattformen verpflichtet, nutzergenerierte Inhalte zu löschen? Alexander Pirang zeigt, dass das Recht auf Meinungsfreiheit nicht durch Plattformregulierung ausgehebelt wird.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Can legislators launder state action through private companies by requiring online platforms to moderate content? Alexander Pirang asserts that platform users right to freedom of expression imposes effective constraints on public authorities power to regulate platform companies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The Digital Services Act aims to tackle illegal online speech by delegating content moderation tasks to platform providers. However, this approach is blurring the boundaries between public and private restrictions of platform users freedom of expression, which raises the question whether platform regulation allows legislators to launder state action through private companies. Alexander Pirang examines how the right to freedom of expression enshrined in the European Unions Charter of Fundamental Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights can function as a constraint on public authority power to regulate online platforms. Specifically, he analyzes how public authorities can be held responsible for speech restrictions enforced by platform providers. He also explores how such restrictions can be justified, with a focus on the necessary safeguards against the over-blocking of lawful content.Survey of contentsIntroductionI. Setting the stage - II. Hypothesis and research questions - III. Research scope - IV. Research design - V. Conceptual clarification: governance and regulation Chapter 1. First-order online speech governance: content moderationI. What is content moderation? - II. What role does context play in content moderation? - III. To what extent does content moderation impact freedom of expression? - IV. How do different incentives and constraints influence platform companies decision-making regarding content moderation? - V. Conclusion Chapter 2. Second-order online speech governance: platform regulationI. How has platform regulation evolved in the EU? - II. What are the rationales behind platform regulation? - III. How does platform regulation interact with other influences on platform companies decision-making? - IV. How does platform regulation operate in practice? - V. Conclusion Chapter 3. Third-order online speech governance: freedom of expressionI. To what extent does platform regulation allow public authorities to launder state action through platform companies private ordering? - II. To what extent does the case law of the ECtHR and the CJEU on causation and attribution provide avenues for overcoming the risks of laundered state action in the context of platform regulation? - III. How can limitations of users right to freedom of expression be established where public authorities require platform companies to moderate content? - IV. To what extent are public authorities obligated to minimize the risks of over-blocking in the context of platform regulation in order to justify limitations of users right to freedom of expression? - V. Conclusion Conclusion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kann sich der Gesetzgeber seiner grundrechtlichen Verantwortung entziehen, indem er Online-Plattformen verpflichtet, nutzergenerierte Inhalte zu löschen? Alexander Pirang zeigt, dass das Recht auf Meinungsfreiheit nicht durch Plattformregulierung ausgehebelt wird.Inhalts+uuml;bersichtIntroductionI. Setting the stage - II. Hypothesis and research questions - III. Research scope - IV. Research design - V. Conceptual clarification: governance and regulation Chapter 1. First-order online speech governance: content moderationI. What is content moderation? - II. What role does context play in content moderation? - III. To what extent does content moderation impact freedom of expression? - IV. How do different incentives and constraints influence platform companies decision-making regarding content moderation? - V. Conclusion Chapter 2. Second-order online speech governance: platform regulationI. How has platform regulation evolved in the EU? - II. What are the rationales behind platform regulation? - III. How does platform regulation interact with other influences on platform companies decision-making? - IV. How does platform regulation operate in practice? - V. Conclusion Chapter 3. Third-order online speech governance: freedom of expressionI. To what extent does platform regulation allow public authorities to launder state action through platform companies private ordering? - II. To what extent does the case law of the ECtHR and the CJEU on causation and attribution provide avenues for overcoming the risks of laundered state action in the context of platform regulation? - III. How can limitations of users right to freedom of expression be established where public authorities require platform companies to moderate content? - IV. To what extent are public authorities obligated to minimize the risks of over-blocking in the context of platform regulation in order to justify limitations of users right to freedom of expression? - V. Conclusion Conclusion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">I. Setting the stage - II. Hypothesis and research questions - III. Research scope - IV. Research design - V. Conceptual clarification: governance and regulation I. What is content moderation? - II. What role does context play in content moderation? - III. To what extent does content moderation impact freedom of expression? - IV. How do different incentives and constraints influence platform companies decision-making regarding content moderation? - V. Conclusion I. How has platform regulation evolved in the EU? - II. What are the rationales behind platform regulation? - III. How does platform regulation interact with other influences on platform companies decision-making? - IV. How does platform regulation operate in practice? - V. Conclusion I. To what extent does platform regulation allow public authorities to launder state action through platform companies private ordering? - II. To what extent does the case law of the ECtHR and the CJEU on causation and attribution provide avenues for overcoming the risks of laundered state action in the context of platform regulation? - III. How can limitations of users right to freedom of expression be established where public authorities require platform companies to moderate content? - IV. To what extent are public authorities obligated to minimize the risks of over-blocking in the context of platform regulation in order to justify limitations of users right to freedom of expression? - V. Conclusion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Meinungsfreiheit</subfield><subfield code="a">Inhalte-Moderation</subfield><subfield code="a">Digital Services Act</subfield><subfield code="a">Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU</subfield><subfield code="a">European Convention on Human Rights</subfield><subfield code="a">Arabic Literature</subfield><subfield code="a">Ko-Regulierung</subfield><subfield code="a">vergleichendes Gesellschaftsrecht</subfield><subfield code="a">Ideenfreiheit</subfield><subfield code="a">bilateral delegation</subfield><subfield code="a">productivity-wage gap</subfield><subfield code="a">Online-Plattformen</subfield><subfield code="a">Environmental crisis</subfield><subfield code="a">Future</subfield><subfield code="a">Christian theology</subfield><subfield code="a">Instrumental cause</subfield><subfield code="a">Scholastic philosophy</subfield><subfield code="a">Normenklarheit</subfield><subfield code="a">Rechtsquellenklarheit</subfield><subfield code="a">Plattformregulierung</subfield><subfield code="a">Förmlichkeit des Verfahrens</subfield><subfield code="a">zwingender Charakter des Prozessrechts</subfield><subfield code="a">Kriegslegitimation</subfield><subfield code="a">Verfassungsrecht und Staatslehre</subfield><subfield code="a">Verwaltungsrecht</subfield><subfield code="a">Völkerrecht</subfield><subfield code="a">Europarecht</subfield><subfield code="a">Array</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-197-MSE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2024</subfield><subfield code="a">EBS-197-MRW</subfield><subfield code="b">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2025</subfield><subfield code="a">EBS-197-MRW</subfield><subfield code="b">2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-197-MSE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | ZDB-197-MSE-50643 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2025-06-23T13:32:28Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9783161639630 |
| language | English |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-355 DE-BY-UBR |
| owner_facet | DE-355 DE-BY-UBR |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (XIX, 430 Seiten) |
| psigel | ZDB-197-MSE UBG_PDA_MSE pdf ZDB-197-MSE EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2024 EBS-197-MRW EBS Rechtswissenschaft 2025 |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publishDateSearch | 2024 |
| publishDateSort | 2024 |
| publisher | Mohr Siebeck |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Internet und Gesellschaft |
| spelling | text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier 9783161639623 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Druckversion Creative Commons cc cc-by-nc-nd-4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Pirang, Alexander aut Freedom of Expression in the Platform Society [Elektronische Ressource] : The Right to Freedom of Expression as a Constraint on Public Authorities Power to Govern Online Speech Through Platform Companies 1. Aufl. Tübingen Mohr Siebeck 2024 1 Online-Ressource (XIX, 430 Seiten) Internet und Gesellschaft 38 PublicationDate: 20241217 Meinungsfreiheit in der Plattformgesellschaft. Das Recht auf freie Meinungsäußerung als Grenze der durch Plattformunternehmen vermittelten staatlichen Regulierung von Meinungsäußerungen im Internet. Kann sich der Gesetzgeber seiner grundrechtlichen Verantwortung entziehen, indem er Online-Plattformen verpflichtet, nutzergenerierte Inhalte zu löschen? Alexander Pirang zeigt, dass das Recht auf Meinungsfreiheit nicht durch Plattformregulierung ausgehebelt wird. Can legislators launder state action through private companies by requiring online platforms to moderate content? Alexander Pirang asserts that platform users right to freedom of expression imposes effective constraints on public authorities power to regulate platform companies. The Digital Services Act aims to tackle illegal online speech by delegating content moderation tasks to platform providers. However, this approach is blurring the boundaries between public and private restrictions of platform users freedom of expression, which raises the question whether platform regulation allows legislators to launder state action through private companies. Alexander Pirang examines how the right to freedom of expression enshrined in the European Unions Charter of Fundamental Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights can function as a constraint on public authority power to regulate online platforms. Specifically, he analyzes how public authorities can be held responsible for speech restrictions enforced by platform providers. He also explores how such restrictions can be justified, with a focus on the necessary safeguards against the over-blocking of lawful content.Survey of contentsIntroductionI. Setting the stage - II. Hypothesis and research questions - III. Research scope - IV. Research design - V. Conceptual clarification: governance and regulation Chapter 1. First-order online speech governance: content moderationI. What is content moderation? - II. What role does context play in content moderation? - III. To what extent does content moderation impact freedom of expression? - IV. How do different incentives and constraints influence platform companies decision-making regarding content moderation? - V. Conclusion Chapter 2. Second-order online speech governance: platform regulationI. How has platform regulation evolved in the EU? - II. What are the rationales behind platform regulation? - III. How does platform regulation interact with other influences on platform companies decision-making? - IV. How does platform regulation operate in practice? - V. Conclusion Chapter 3. Third-order online speech governance: freedom of expressionI. To what extent does platform regulation allow public authorities to launder state action through platform companies private ordering? - II. To what extent does the case law of the ECtHR and the CJEU on causation and attribution provide avenues for overcoming the risks of laundered state action in the context of platform regulation? - III. How can limitations of users right to freedom of expression be established where public authorities require platform companies to moderate content? - IV. To what extent are public authorities obligated to minimize the risks of over-blocking in the context of platform regulation in order to justify limitations of users right to freedom of expression? - V. Conclusion Conclusion Kann sich der Gesetzgeber seiner grundrechtlichen Verantwortung entziehen, indem er Online-Plattformen verpflichtet, nutzergenerierte Inhalte zu löschen? Alexander Pirang zeigt, dass das Recht auf Meinungsfreiheit nicht durch Plattformregulierung ausgehebelt wird.Inhalts+uuml;bersichtIntroductionI. Setting the stage - II. Hypothesis and research questions - III. Research scope - IV. Research design - V. Conceptual clarification: governance and regulation Chapter 1. First-order online speech governance: content moderationI. What is content moderation? - II. What role does context play in content moderation? - III. To what extent does content moderation impact freedom of expression? - IV. How do different incentives and constraints influence platform companies decision-making regarding content moderation? - V. Conclusion Chapter 2. Second-order online speech governance: platform regulationI. How has platform regulation evolved in the EU? - II. What are the rationales behind platform regulation? - III. How does platform regulation interact with other influences on platform companies decision-making? - IV. How does platform regulation operate in practice? - V. Conclusion Chapter 3. Third-order online speech governance: freedom of expressionI. To what extent does platform regulation allow public authorities to launder state action through platform companies private ordering? - II. To what extent does the case law of the ECtHR and the CJEU on causation and attribution provide avenues for overcoming the risks of laundered state action in the context of platform regulation? - III. How can limitations of users right to freedom of expression be established where public authorities require platform companies to moderate content? - IV. To what extent are public authorities obligated to minimize the risks of over-blocking in the context of platform regulation in order to justify limitations of users right to freedom of expression? - V. Conclusion Conclusion I. Setting the stage - II. Hypothesis and research questions - III. Research scope - IV. Research design - V. Conceptual clarification: governance and regulation I. What is content moderation? - II. What role does context play in content moderation? - III. To what extent does content moderation impact freedom of expression? - IV. How do different incentives and constraints influence platform companies decision-making regarding content moderation? - V. Conclusion I. How has platform regulation evolved in the EU? - II. What are the rationales behind platform regulation? - III. How does platform regulation interact with other influences on platform companies decision-making? - IV. How does platform regulation operate in practice? - V. Conclusion I. To what extent does platform regulation allow public authorities to launder state action through platform companies private ordering? - II. To what extent does the case law of the ECtHR and the CJEU on causation and attribution provide avenues for overcoming the risks of laundered state action in the context of platform regulation? - III. How can limitations of users right to freedom of expression be established where public authorities require platform companies to moderate content? - IV. To what extent are public authorities obligated to minimize the risks of over-blocking in the context of platform regulation in order to justify limitations of users right to freedom of expression? - V. Conclusion Meinungsfreiheit Inhalte-Moderation Digital Services Act Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU European Convention on Human Rights Arabic Literature Ko-Regulierung vergleichendes Gesellschaftsrecht Ideenfreiheit bilateral delegation productivity-wage gap Online-Plattformen Environmental crisis Future Christian theology Instrumental cause Scholastic philosophy Normenklarheit Rechtsquellenklarheit Plattformregulierung Förmlichkeit des Verfahrens zwingender Charakter des Prozessrechts Kriegslegitimation Verfassungsrecht und Staatslehre Verwaltungsrecht Völkerrecht Europarecht Array |
| spellingShingle | Pirang, Alexander Freedom of Expression in the Platform Society The Right to Freedom of Expression as a Constraint on Public Authorities Power to Govern Online Speech Through Platform Companies I. Setting the stage - II. Hypothesis and research questions - III. Research scope - IV. Research design - V. Conceptual clarification: governance and regulation I. What is content moderation? - II. What role does context play in content moderation? - III. To what extent does content moderation impact freedom of expression? - IV. How do different incentives and constraints influence platform companies decision-making regarding content moderation? - V. Conclusion I. How has platform regulation evolved in the EU? - II. What are the rationales behind platform regulation? - III. How does platform regulation interact with other influences on platform companies decision-making? - IV. How does platform regulation operate in practice? - V. Conclusion I. To what extent does platform regulation allow public authorities to launder state action through platform companies private ordering? - II. To what extent does the case law of the ECtHR and the CJEU on causation and attribution provide avenues for overcoming the risks of laundered state action in the context of platform regulation? - III. How can limitations of users right to freedom of expression be established where public authorities require platform companies to moderate content? - IV. To what extent are public authorities obligated to minimize the risks of over-blocking in the context of platform regulation in order to justify limitations of users right to freedom of expression? - V. Conclusion |
| title | Freedom of Expression in the Platform Society The Right to Freedom of Expression as a Constraint on Public Authorities Power to Govern Online Speech Through Platform Companies |
| title_auth | Freedom of Expression in the Platform Society The Right to Freedom of Expression as a Constraint on Public Authorities Power to Govern Online Speech Through Platform Companies |
| title_exact_search | Freedom of Expression in the Platform Society The Right to Freedom of Expression as a Constraint on Public Authorities Power to Govern Online Speech Through Platform Companies |
| title_full | Freedom of Expression in the Platform Society [Elektronische Ressource] : The Right to Freedom of Expression as a Constraint on Public Authorities Power to Govern Online Speech Through Platform Companies |
| title_fullStr | Freedom of Expression in the Platform Society [Elektronische Ressource] : The Right to Freedom of Expression as a Constraint on Public Authorities Power to Govern Online Speech Through Platform Companies |
| title_full_unstemmed | Freedom of Expression in the Platform Society [Elektronische Ressource] : The Right to Freedom of Expression as a Constraint on Public Authorities Power to Govern Online Speech Through Platform Companies |
| title_short | Freedom of Expression in the Platform Society |
| title_sort | freedom of expression in the platform society the right to freedom of expression as a constraint on public authorities power to govern online speech through platform companies |
| title_sub | The Right to Freedom of Expression as a Constraint on Public Authorities Power to Govern Online Speech Through Platform Companies |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pirangalexander freedomofexpressionintheplatformsocietytherighttofreedomofexpressionasaconstraintonpublicauthoritiespowertogovernonlinespeechthroughplatformcompanies |